Een v. Consolidated Freightways’s Empirical Analysis
220 F.2d 82 · 1955
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 1988 · most notably Feguer v. United States (1962), Solomon Dehydrating Company, Incorporated v. Clarence R. Guyton, Central Greyhound Lines, Incorporated, and the Greyhound Corporation (1961)
40 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Builders Steel Co. v. Commissioner · United States Smelting Co. v. Parry · Minnehaha County v. Kelley · Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can only consider the question of the sufficiency of the evidence when that has been made a question of law and this can only be done by interposing a motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`Where complaint is made that the court erred in overruling an objection to the admissibility of evidence, it is generally essential that the objection definitely and specifically state the grounds on which it is based so that the court may intelligently rule upon it. In other words, the appellate court will not reverse on a ruling which overrules an objection to testimony, unless a good objection has been made, even though the testimony might have been objectionable on grounds not specifically and sharply called to the court's attention.' 47”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““No error in either the admission or the exclusion of evidence * * is ground * * * for setting aside a verdict * * * or otherwise disturbing a judgment * * unless refusal to take such action appears to the court inconsistent with substantial justice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.