United States v. Cormier’s Empirical Analysis
220 F.3d 1103 · 2000
Citation profile
49 federal appellate · 7 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably United States of America v. Maurillo Rojas-Millan (2000), United States v. Lopez (2007)
49 federal appellate · 7 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Florida v. Bostick · Stoner v. California · United States v. Miller · Davis v. United States · United States v. Tobin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Absent express orders from the person in possession against any possible trespass, there is no rule of private or pubhc conduct which makes it illegal per se, or a condemned invasion of the person’s right of privacy, for anyone openly and peaceably, at high noon, to walk up the steps and knock on the front door of any man’s “castle” with the honest intent of asking questions of the occupant thereof whether the questioner be a pollster, a salesman, or an officer of the law.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) whether defendant was in custody; (2) whether the arresting officers had their guns drawn; (3) whether Miranda warnings were given; (4) whether the defendant was told he had the right not to consent; and (5) whether the defendant was told that a search warrant could be obtained.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a person does not possess a reasonable expectation of privacy in an item in which he has no possessory or ownership interest.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.