Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 F.3d 276 - Wesley Eugene Baker v.Thomas Corcoran

Wesley Eugene Baker v.Thomas Corcoran’s Empirical Analysis

220 F.3d 276 · 2000

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Ernest Sutton Bell v. Mack Jarvis Robert Smith (2000), Fullwood v. Lee (2002)

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

250200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Williams v. Taylor · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · United States v. Cronic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “both the operative facts and the controlling legal principles.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he exhaustion requirement is satisfied so long as a claim has been `fairly presented' to the state courts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “-before turning to the§ 2254(d) question of whether the state court determination resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, the applicable law. Infra at 176-77. We disagree. 1. 18 In support of the argument that federal habeas courts must render an independent determination of whether the state court, in its judgment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.