Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 F.3d 607 - At&t v. U S

At&t v. U S’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

15 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control (2002), 134 F. Supp. 2d 490 - MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. New York Telephone Co. (2001)

15 district · 3 state decisions

210200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council · Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. · Maryland v. United States Tandy Corporation v. United States North American Telephone Association v. United States Illinois v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “permits reversal 'only if the agency's decision is not supported by substantial evidence, or the agency has made a clear error in judgment.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Commission has wide discretion to determine where to draw administrative lines, and appellants point to nothing suggesting that the agency abused its discretion in drawing the line[s]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “clear errors in factual findings on matters so substantial that the end result falls outside the range that the reasonable application of TELRIC would produce.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Lp v. Sbc

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.