220 F. Supp. 466 - Harding v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2015
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Johnson · Matzen v. Hugoton Production Co. · Young v. West Edmond Hunton Lime Unit · Molter v. Lewis · Townsend v. Creekmore-Rooney Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The rule in Oklahoma fixing the ‘value’ or ‘market price’ of gas at the wellhead and processed by the lessee through a compressor plant constructed by it is the gross price which the lessee receives from the purchaser less the actual cost of compression and reasonable depreciation on its compressor plant."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"When the question is one of common or general interest of many persons, or when the parties are very numerous, and it may be impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of all." (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.