220 F. Supp. 2d 832 - Wright v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Missouri Kansas Texas Railway Company v. Harriman Brothers · Emmons v. McLaughlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any claim or lawsuit ... no more than six (6) months after the date of the employment action that is the subject of the claim or lawsuit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Logan v. Casino
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.