H.E. v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1413 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 20 U.S.C. § 1416
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E. · Lauren v. Deflaminis · Carlisle Area School v. Scott P. ex rel. Bess P.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) the requirements of this subchapter are met; (ii) all educational programs for children with disabilities in the State, including all such programs administered by any other State agency or local agency- (I) are under the general supervision of individuals in the State who are responsible for educational programs for children with disabilities; and (II) meet the educational standards of the State educational agency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]n opportunity for any party to present a complaint ... with respect to any matter relating to the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the child, or the provision of a free appropriate public education to such child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where the LEA has ceased to exist, a parent may look to the SEA to vindicate their child's right to FAPE.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.