Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

220 Ga. 595

Hames v. Hames

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 4, 1965

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1965-02-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1970

1 state decisions

Relies on Todd v. Morgan

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-02-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Qtjillian, Justice.

¶1The only question presented by the assignment of error in the present case is whether the Act of 1941, as amended (Ga. L. 1941, pp. 487-489; Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 313, 314), embodied in Code Ann. § 67-1308, is applicable to a note and security deed given to secure the same where the note matured before the Act, according to its provisions, became effective as a statute of the State. This precise question is answered in the negative in the case of Todd v. Morgan, 215 Ga. 220, 221 (2) (109 SE2d 803). The Toddcase is controlling here.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.Submitted January 11, 1965Decided February 4, 1965.G. W. Langford, for plaintiff in error.Shaw, Stolz & Fletcher, contra.
/220/ga/595 · .json · Public domain