Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 Ind. 668 - Midland v. State

Midland v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1972
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1972

6 state decisions

201943195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kelley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘To authorize a life sentence, the previous convictions, sentences and imprisonments must be described specifically, and the jury must find that the defendant was convicted, sentenced and imprisoned in the instances described and not otherwise.’ Kelley v. State (1933), 204 Ind. 612, 616 , 185 N. E. 453, 455 ; Barr v. State (1933), 205 Ind. 481, 485 , 187 N. E. 259 ; Midland v. State (1943), 220 Ind. 668, 670 , 46 N. E. 2d 200 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . the indictment or affidavit shall allege that the defendant has been previously twice convicted, sentenced and imprisoned in some penal institution, for felonies, describing each separately. . . .” (Our Italics).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““. . . It is necessary, in order to properly advise appellant of the offense charged, to allege the previous felony of which he was convicted, with the time, place, and judgment. Failure to allege the previous conviction with sufficient certainty renders the charge subject to the motion to quash the second count of the affidavit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.