State v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 2004 · most notably United States v. Harding (1977), State v. Sanders (1978)
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · Hoffa v. United States · United States v. White · United States v. District Court · Britt v. North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The defense of entrapment arises when a law enforcement officer, or someone acting on his behalf, generates in the mind of a person who is innocent of any criminal purpose the original intent or idea to commit a crime which he had not contemplated and would not have committed but for the inducement of the law officer. (State v. Hamrick, 206 Kan. 543 , 479 P. 2d 854 .) A defendant can rely on the defense of entrapment when he is induced to commit a crime which he had no previous intention of committing, but he cannot rely on the defense or obtain an instruction on entrapment when the evidence establishes he had a previous intention of committing the crime and was merely afforded an opportunity by a law officer to complete it. (State v. Wheat, 205 Kan. 439 , 469 P. 2d 338 .)” (p. 116.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Amodei““In determining whether an indigent defendant in a criminal proceeding is entitled to a transcript of a trial or other proceeding prepared at State expense, tire court may consider the availability of alternative devices that would fulfill the same functions as a transcript. [Citations omitted.] An indigent criminal defendant on proper showing of need is entitled to have a transcript of portions of previous trial proceedings prepared at State expense, subject however to a determination by the trial court that such transcript is necessary for die indigent to present his defense adequately.” State v. Jordan, 220 Kan. 110, 113 , 551 P.2d 773 (1976).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““It is settled law that a state agent may tape-record such telephone conversation without violating the other party’s Fourth Amendment rights if the agent is a party to the conversation or has the consent of one party. (Citations omitted.)” p. 166.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.