State v. Bohanan’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2 district · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently May 2012 · most notably State v. Graham (1990), State v. WARRIOR (2012)
2 district · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Brunner · State v. Frizzell · United States v. Akin · State v. Carson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A person who has not been arrested is not in police custody unless there are significant restraints on his freedom of movement which are imposed by some law enforcement agency.'" 240 Kan. at 181 (quoting State v. Bohanan, 220 Kan. 121 , Syl. ¶ 2, 551 P.2d 828 [1976]).”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““. . . Because of the difficulty of formulating a precise definition of ‘custodial interrogation’ the courts have taken a ‘case-by-case’ approach to resolving questions of custodial interrogation. (United States v. Akin, [C.A. 5th, 1970] 435 F. 2d 1011 .) The particular factural circumstances in each case are therefore of the upmost importance.” (p. 127.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.