Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 Kan. 136 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
11
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Salazar (1997), State v. Costa (1980)

56 state decisions — followed in 11 states

180197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Faretta v. California · Durham v. United States · Commonwealth v. Walker · State v. Ponds and Garrett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * While death moots the sentence, renders impossible a new trial, and abates any fine imposed, the matter of costs remains. The state and the defendant (not to mention his family) have endured the strain, the tribulation and the expense of trial and appeal. Oftentimes rights other than those of an individual defendant are involved. The right to inherit, or to take by will or otherwise, may be affected.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Death of an appellant during the pendency of his direct appeal from the conviction of a criminal offense does not abate the appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “proceeding should be adjudicated upon the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.