Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 Kan. 720 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2005

24 state decisions

1001976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Boyd · State v. Gregory · State v. Ritson · State v. Pyle · State v. Doyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a well established rule that circumstantial evidence can be used to prove any element of a crime (State v. Rhoten, 174 Kan. 394 , 257 P.2d 141 ; State v. Dill, 182 Kan. 174 , 319 P.2d 172 ; State v. Crosby, 182 Kan. 677 , 324 P.2d 197 ), and can sustain a conviction of even the gravest offense. (State v. Morton, 217 Kan. 642 , 538 P.2d 675 ; State v. Ritson, 215 Kan. 742 , 529 P.2d 90 ; State v. Hale, 207 Kan. 446 , 485 P.2d 1338 .)” State v. Johnson, 220 Kan. 720, 722 , 556 P.2d 168 (1976).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Where the circumstances are as consistent with the absence as well as the presence of crime, the corpus delicti has not been proved since the evidence is susceptible to a construction which will prove innocence as well as guilt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.