State v. Wilkins’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably State v. Haislip (1985), State v. Newman (1984)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Palermo v. United States · United States v. Augenblick · United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. Turner · United States v. Perry · State v. Humphrey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"why the statement was not produced; if it was lost, the facts and circumstances surrounding the loss; the negligence or fault on the part of the state; the nature, relevance and importance of the statement; the risk of prejudice to the defendant; the essentiality of the testimony to the state; and the other evidence in the case." State v. Wilkins, 220 Kan. 735, 741 , 556 P.2d 424 (1976).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[T]he trial court in the exercise of sound judicial discretion must consider the materiality and importance of the documents not produced, whether the failure to produce is caused by inability, willfulness or bad faith, and whether some available sanction short of dismissal will protect the party seeking discovery.” 220 Kan. at 742 , citing Vickers v. City of Kansas City, 216 Kan. 84 . Emphasis added.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Wanttaja
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.