State v. Gander’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently January 1999 · most notably State v. Faulkner (1976), State v. Myrick & Nelms (1980)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Masqua · State v. McCorgary · State v. Cameron & Bentley · State v. Seely · State v. Ponds and Garrett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘A change of venue in a criminal case lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. [Citations omitted.] The burden of proof is cast upon defendant to show prejudice in the community which will prevent him from obtaining a fair and impartial trial. [Citations omitted.] Media publicity alone has never established prejudice per se. Defendant must show prejudice has reached the community to the degree it is impossible to get an impartial jury.’ “ ‘Furthermore, prejudice must be established “not as a matter of speculation but as a demonstrable reality.” ’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Moreover, in an abundance of caution, the trial court gave a limiting instruction to the effect that the evidence of the prior conviction should only be considered in connection with the weapons violation. The evidence was admissible without regard to K.S.A. 60-455, so the instruction was not required in the absence of a request. (State v. Knowles, 209 Kan. 676 , 498 P.2d 40 , Syl. Para. 3.) It did however, help to offset any prejudice resulting from the joinder.” 220 Kan. at 90-91 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Denney““Several separate and distinct felonies may be charged in separate counts of one and the same information, where all of the offenses charged are of the same general character, requiring the same mode of trial, the same kind of evidence, and the same kind of punishment. [Citations omitted.] The defendant may be tried upon all the several counts of the information at one and the same time, and in one trial, but all this rests in the sound judicial discretion of the trial court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barksdale
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.