Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 Md. 454 - Boblit v. State

Boblit v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

4 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2005 · most notably Brady v. State of Maryland (1963), United States v. Agurs (1976)

4 district · 23 state decisions

1402001decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chisley v. State · Stansbury v. State · Daniels v. State · Peters and Demby v. State · Shockley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is conceded that Brady and Boblit lay in wait for the victim, William Brooks, placing a log across his private driveway, in order to obtain possession of his ear and money. Boblit was armed with a shotgun and Brady with a pistol. When Brooks got out of his car, Boblit struck him in the head with the barrel of the shotgun. They placed Brooks in the car, and after driving a certain distance, they carried Brooks into the woods, where one of them throttled him with Bob-lit’s shirt. Each claimed that the other had actually strangled Mr. Brooks. They concealed the body and divided the contents of Brooks’ pocketbook containing some $250. They abandoned the car near Lynchburg, Virginia. Boblit went home, Brady fled to Florida.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.