Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 Md. 584 - Eisel v. Howell

Eisel v. Howell’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2006 · most notably State v. Green (2001), 21 Md. App. 307 - Bel Pre Medical Center, Inc. v. Frederick Contractors, Inc. (1974)

41 state decisions

140195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc. · Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co. · McCormick v. St. Francis De Sales Church · Meacham v. Jamestown, Franklin & Clearfield Railroad · State v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The denial of a challenge to the jurisdiction does not settle or conclude the rights of any party or deny him the means of proceeding further. It settles nothing finally. An order which does none of these things is not appealable.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The denial of a challenge to the jurisdiction does not settle or conclude the rights of any party or deny him the means of proceeding further. It settles nothing finally. An order which does none of these things is not appealable.... Whenever a court makes a disposition or order, it does so on the basis that it has jurisdiction, and if its express announcement of that fact constituted an appealable order, it would be impossible for a court to proceed with the trial of any case in which its jurisdiction was challenged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.