Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 Md. 70 - Ryan v. Johnson

Ryan v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

2 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2007

2 district · 20 state decisions

80195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clarke Baridon, Inc. v. Union Asbestos & Rubber Co. · Pumphrey v. Grapes · Manos v. Fickenscher · Phelps v. Herro · Malone v. Topfer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““After the judgment properly was entered, the question of whether it should or should not be vacated in whole or in part was within the sound discretion of the 1 trial court for the ensuing thirty days. The decisive point no longer was whether there existed a genuine dispute as to a material fact, but rather whether the court was satisfied that there had been shown a reasonable indication of a meritorious defense or other equitable circumstances that would justify striking the judgment—that is, whether the court entertained a reasonable doubt that justice had not been done.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We think that the asserted defense that the payments were gifts, if substantiated, would constitute a valid and meritorious defense. * * * “Since the trial court appears to have proceeded upon a contrary view of what would constitute a valid defense, we think that the denial of an opportunity to present the defense here asserted resulted in an abuse of the court’s discretion in refusing to strike out the judgment.” Id. at 73 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.