Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

220 N.C. 535

17 S.E.2d 661

State v. . Sturdivant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1941

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1941-12-10

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1953

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1941-12-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Curiam.

¶1 Defendant, having been permitted to appeal in forma pauperis, docketed in this Court typewritten record and case on appeal but he failed to file a brief. Thereupon the Attorney-General moved to dismiss under Eule No. 28. In re Bailey, 180 N. C., 30, 103 S. E., 896; Comrs. v. Dickson, 190 N. C., 330, 129 S. E., 814.

¶2 As is the custom with us in criminal causes involving the death penalty; before acting upon the motion of the Attorney-General, we have carefully examined the record. No material defect appears therein. We have likewise considered the exceptions appearing in the case on appeal. They are without merit. The motion to dismiss is allowed.

¶3 Judgment affirmed.

¶4 Appeal dismissed.

/220/nc/535 · .json · Public domain