Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

220 Neb. 807

374 N.W.2d 1

State v. Litzenburg

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1985

Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1985-09-05

Relies on State v. Tweedy · State v. Wright · State v. Branch

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-09-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2001

5 state decisions

20198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 This case is a direct appeal in which the only error assigned is that the sentence imposed was excessive. That contention is without merit.

¶2 In this case, however, the record discloses plain error in that the trial court at the arraignment failed to advise the defendant of his right against self-incrimination. Such a record will not support a finding that the plea was entered voluntarily and intelligently. State v. Tweedy, 209 Neb. 649, 309 N.W.2d 94 (1981); State v. Branch, ante p. 754, 371 N.W.2d 740 (1985); State v. Wright, post p. 847, 374 N.W.2d 26 (1985).

¶3 Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, defendant’s conviction and sentence are vacated, and the cause is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

¶4 Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

/220/neb/807 · .json · Public domain