Schwartz v. . Cahill’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1975
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Woodruff v. . Erie Railway Company · Belmont v. . Coman · Dingeldein v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co. · Smith v. . Cornell · Prince v. . Schlesinger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This action is brought by the landlord to recover $1,508.67, the value of the use and occupation, at the rate fixed by the lease, during the period of the receiver’s possession. The rent due at the time of the receiver’s appointment is not included. As to that the landlord must share, proportionately with other creditors, on a distribution of the assets. Rent during the receiver’s possession stands, however, on a different basis.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Renberg v. Thede
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.