Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

220 Or. 229

Curry v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1960

Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1960-02-10

Decided 1960-02-10

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is a post conviction proceeding in which it has now been stipulated that the contentions made by David Rex Curry, the plaintiff in this proceeding, are identical with the contentions made by the plaintiff in the case of Lilly v. Gladden, 220 Or 84, 348 P2d 1, and that our decision in that case is controlling here. The parties have waived the filing of briefs and oral argument and request the . court to determine this case on the record.

¶2We have examined the record and agree that Lilly v. Gladden, supra, is controlling. The case is remanded with directions to vacate the judgment discharging plaintiff, to sustain defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition and to enter a judgment returning plaintiff to the custody of the defendant. Our mandate will issue forthwith.

/220/or/229 · .json · Public domain