220 Or. App. 487 - State v. Chatelain’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[a] defendant's intent to commit a crime at the time of an unlawful entry is central to the crime of burglary. Without it a defendant's conduct cannot constitute burglary of any degree; that intent is, in fact, the essence of the offense.' (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“" ' "basic rationale of the sections on criminal trespass is the protection of one's property from the unauthorized intrusion by others," the injury or harm associated with burglary goes beyond that and includes the protection of one's property against the threat of intrusion for the purpose of committing a crime [.]' "”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“' "basic rationale of the sections on criminal trespass is the protection of one's property from the unauthorized intrusion by others,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.