220 Or. App. 617 - State v. Luman’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"the mere fact that a private third party has knowledge of the contents of something in which a defendant claims a privacy interest—even if that party conveys the information to the police—does not mean that a defendant no longer has `the right to be free from intrusive forms of government scrutiny.' State v. Dixson/Digby, 307 Or. 195, 208 , 766 P.2d 1015 (1988). Article I, section 9, does not countenance such a result."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 231 Or. App. 80 - State v. Bellar

2. “whether the fact that [the] defendant's employees had viewed a portion of the tape before turning it over to the police somehow eliminated [the] defendant's constitutionally protected privacy interest in its contents.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 231 Or. App. 80 - State v. Bellar

3. “simply whether, by viewing the videotapes without first obtaining a warrant, [the police] unlawfully `searched' the videotapes, in violation of defendant's rights under Article I, section 9.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 231 Or. App. 80 - State v. Bellar