Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 P.3d 1226 - State v. Winterstein

State v. Winterstein’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

55 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · Nix v. Williams · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · State v. Hendrickson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “incompatible with the nearly categorical exclusionary rule under article I, section 7.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “clearly recognizes an individual's right to privacy with no express limitations.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The independent source doctrine is much different from the inevitable discovery doctrine. The independent source doctrine recognizes that probable cause may exist based on legally obtained evidence; the tainted evidence, however, is suppressed.... In contrast, the inevitable discovery doctrine is necessarily speculative and does not disregard illegally obtained evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.