Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 So. 2d 345 - Colson v. Sims

220 So. 2d 345 - Colson v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably 556 So. 2d 303 - McDaniel v. Ritter (1989), 603 So. 2d 843 - Ahmad v. State (1992)

31 state decisions

100196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. State · Chapman v. Powers · Lamar v. State · Vaughan v. BOLLIS · SUN-RISE RICE FARMS v. Hawkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The denial of a continuance in the trial court is not reviewable unless the party whose motion for continuance was denied makes a motion for a new trial on this ground, making the necessary proof to substantiate the motion.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The appellees contend that even if the items of medical expense were provable by a local doctor, the appellant in this case could not argue this point on appeal, because, it is said, he did not raise this ground in his motion for a new trial. He cannot now, therefore, put the trial court in error on a point on which it had no opportunity to rule. This argument is not tenable: first — because the trial court did pass upon the issue and did not permit the introduction of the evidence; and second — it is not necessary to make a motion for a new trial in order to preserve the question for appeal where the error is the failure to permit the introduction of essential evidence. Deposit Guaranty Bank and Trust Co. v. Silver Saver Stores, 166 Miss. 882 , 148 So. 367 (1933).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.