Woolf v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Batson v. Kentucky · Witherspoon v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘“To decide if a suspect is in custody [for purposes of triggering a Miranda warning], the court, looking at the totality of the circumstances, must find that a reasonable person in the suspect’s position would believe that he or she is not free to leave.’ Seagroves v. State, 726 So.2d 738, 742 (Ala.Crim.App.1998).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Okafor v. State“[M]ixed views on or reservations concerning the death penalty are a race-neutral reason for a strike of a prospective juror.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.