Burns v. Bockorick’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Touhey v. Seda · Anthony David v. Marlene Schack · 940 So. 2d 609 - Brown v. State · Ceelen v. Grant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'In order to be entitled to an injunction for stalking, the petitioner must allege and prove two separate instances of stalking.' ") (quoting David v. Schack , 192 So.3d 625 , 627-28 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) ); Klemple v. Gagliano , 197 So.3d 1283 , 1285 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (same); Richards v. Gonzalez , 178 So.3d 451 , 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (referring to " [e]ach incident of stalking”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pickett v. Copeland“create[s] a cause of action for an injunction for protection against stalking.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pickett v. Copeland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.