Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 U.S. 107 - Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.

Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.’s Empirical Analysis

220 U.S. 107 · 1911

Citation profile

2,040
cited by 2,040 later decisions
248
cited 248 times by the Supreme Court
44
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

532 federal appellate · 254 district · 418 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,040 later decisions (248 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (1985), Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad (1916)

532 federal appellate · 254 district · 418 state decisions — followed in 44 states

5930191119201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boyd v. United States · M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Gibbons v. Ogden · Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · Mattox v. United States

Cited together with Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad · Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co. · McCoach v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven Railroad · Zonne v. Minneapolis Syndicate · Knowlton v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,040 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This court adopted with approval the definition, judicially approved in other cases, which included within the comprehensive term ‘business’ ‘that which occupies the time, attention, and labor of men for the purpose of a livelihood or profit.’ ””
    31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The true distinction is between the attempted taxation of those operations of the States essential to the execution of its governmental functions, and which the State can only do itself, and those activities which are of a private character. The former, the United States may not interfere with by taxing the agencies of the State in carrying out its purposes; the latter, although regulated by the State, and exercising delegated authority, such as the right of eminent domain, are not removed from the field of legitimate Federal taxation.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “germane to the subject-matter of the bill”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.