Ex parte Oklahoma’s Empirical Analysis
220 U.S. 191 · 1911
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 82 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1988 · most notably Ex parte Bakelite Corp. (1929), Maryland v. Soper (1926)
17 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Boyd v. United States · Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Smyth v. Ames
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“■“has clearly no jurisdiction of the suit or prosecution instituted before it, and the defendant therein has objected to its jurisdiction at the outset, and has no other remedy, he is entitled to a writ of prohibition as a matter of right.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.