220 Wis. 2d 102 - State v. Bodoh’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 44 Wis. 2d 177 - State v. Davidson · 168 Wis. 2d 245 - State v. Sinks · 191 Wis. 2d 812 - Graziano v. Town of Long Lake · 204 Wis. 2d 82 - Chvala v. Bubolz · 156 Wis. 2d 371 - State v. Kastner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The statute requires that a person use or intend to use an object, animate or inanimate, as a dangerous weapon. Once that intent is expressed, there is a duty to operate or handle that dangerous weapon so as to avoid criminal liability. But a dog does not become a dangerous weapon unless the owner intends the dog to be used as such.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“ordinary negligence to a high degree, consisting of conduct which the actor should realize creates a substantial and unreasonable risk of death or great bodily harm to another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Criminal negligence means the creation of a substantial and unreasonable risk of death or great bodily harm to another, of which the actor should be aware.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.