Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 Wis. 2d 260 - Johnson v. Blackburn

220 Wis. 2d 260 - Johnson v. Blackburn’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gross v. Hoffman · 195 Wis. 2d 485 - M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc. · 70 Wis. 2d 836 - Antoniewicz v. Reszczynski · 197 Wis. 2d 409 - Rockweit v. Senecal · 128 Wis. 2d 508 - State Bank of La Crosse v. Elsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “101.645 Smoke detectors. (1) DEFINITION. The definition of "smoke detector" under s. 101.145(l)(c) also applies to this section. (2) APPROVAL AND INSTALLATION. A smoke detector required under this section shall be approved and installed as required under s. 101.145(2) and (3)(a). (3) REQUIREMENT. The owner of a dwelling shall install a functional smoke detector in the basement of the dwelling and on each floor level except the attic or storage area of each dwelling. The occupant of such a dwelling unit shall maintain any smoke detector in that unit, except that if any occupant who is not the owner, or any state, county, city, village or town officer, agent or employe charged under statute or municipal ordinance with powers or duties involving inspection of real or personal property, gives written notice to the owner that the smoke detector is not functional the owner shall provide, within 5 days after receipt of that notice, any maintenance necessary to make that smoke detector functional. (4) INSPECTION. The department or a municipal authority may inspect new dwellings, may inspect the common areas of dwellings and, at the request of the owner or renter, may inspect the interior of a dwelling unit in a dwelling to ensure compliance with this section.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a person who enters or remains upon land in the possession of another without a privilege to do so created by the possessor's consent or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.