Thompson v. Chadwick’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2006
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Werbe v. Holt · Cook, Comm. of Revenues v. Ark.-Mo. Power Corp. · State v. International Harvester Co. · Hollis Company v. McCarroll, Commissioner · Superior Bath House v. McCarroll, Comm. of Rev.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““So the Commissioner had from May 7th to May 24th to determine whether Donan had paid all taxes dne the State. If the Commissioner had been dissatisfied or uncertain as to the correctness of Donan’s return, then a permit should not have been issued to Chadwick until all doubts had been removed as to the full payment of tax by Donau. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cheney v. Belote
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.