State v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 district · 118 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably State v. Padua (2005), State v. Figueroa (1995)
1 district · 118 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Manson v. Brathwaite · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Benton v. Maryland · State v. Golding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]irst, it must be determined whether the identification procedure was unnecessarily suggestive; and second, if it is found to have been so, it must be determined whether the identification was nevertheless reliable based on CT Page 4393 an examination of the totality of the circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[u]pon inspecting the records in camera, the trial court must determine whether the records are especially probative of the witness' capacity to relate the truth or to observe, recollect and narrate relevant occurrences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.