Wiseman v. Tanner’s Empirical Analysis
221 F. 694 · 1914
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1962
3 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Cannon v. United States · Joseph Lochner v. People of the State of New York · Henning Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The general rule that equity will not enjoin criminal proceedings is subject to an exception where property rights will be destroyed by ¡criminal proceedings under an unconstitutional or invalid statute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.