Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 221 F.2d 721 - Peters v. Smith

Peters v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

221 F.2d 721 · 1955

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 1994
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1994 · most notably Flora v. United States (1960), Portage II IV v. Bryant Petroleum Corp N (1990)

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

14019551960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 22

Relies on Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Duncan · Bogardus v. Commissioner · Marsh v. Illinois Cent. R. · Secretary of Agriculture v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the employer in providing the questioned payments did not indicate unequivocally whether such action was intended as additional compensation for past services, or merely as an expression of a philanthropic attitude, or as a bid for employee good will, or as some combination of these.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.