Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

221 F.2d 798

Docket No. 14730.

Lipscomb v. Madigan

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1955.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-04-21

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-04-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1990

6 federal appellate ·

2019551960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert E. Lipscomb, in pro. per.

¶2Lloyc. H. Burke, U. S. Atty., Richard H. Foster, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Movant seeks to docket his appeal in forma pauperis from an order of the United States Court, Northern District of California, Southern Division, denying his application for writ of habeas corpus. His application was denied on February 10, 1955, and rehearing was denied on February 24, 1955. He filed his notice of appeal in timely fashion.

¶6Subsequent to this application Lipscomb paid his docket fee. The application having become moot, it is ordered dismissed.

/221/f2d/798 · .json · Public domain