221 F.2d 807
Docket Nos. 200, 201, Dockets 23248, 23249.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-04-25
2 counsel of record
Relies on Holland v. United States · Smith v. United States · United States v. Calderon
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-04-25
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1980
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Thomas L. Zimmerman, New York City, for petitioners.
¶2Meyer Rothwacks, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen. (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.
¶3Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
¶5Affirmed on the opinion of Judge Raum, 22 T.C. 61.