Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

221 F.2d 957

Docket No. 259, Docket 23380.

Basil v. Cyr

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued March 10, 1955.

Decided March 29, 1955.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-03-29

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-03-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1984

3 federal appellate ·

101955196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Desmond & Drury, Buffalo, N. Y., James C. Heaney, Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Bernard Katzen, General Attorney of State Insurance Fund, New York City (Victor Fiddler, Glen Oaks, N. Y., and George J. Hayes, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees Grain Handling Co., Inc., and State Insurance Fund.

¶3Before MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges, and BURKE, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Affirmed on the opinion below, filed on September 23, 1954. While plaintiff gave some testimony on cross-examination, in addition to the quotation from his direct examination, which Judge Knight describes as the “sole evidence” of the alleged telephone conversation on April 30, 1951, this in no way alters the result.

/221/f2d/957 · .json · Public domain