Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 221 F.3d 583 - Ernest P. McCarver v. R. C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina

Ernest P. McCarver v. R. C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina’s Empirical Analysis

221 F.3d 583 · 2000

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson · Murray v. Carrier · United States v. Frady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “allege additional facts that, if true, would entitle him to relief.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he question we must ask ... is whether the particular procedural bar is applied consistently to cases that are procedurally analogous — here, cases in which the particular claim raised could have been raised previously but was not.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`is not a general rule that any claim not brought on direct appeal is forfeited on state collateral review. Instead, the rule requires North Carolina courts to determine whether the particular claim at issue could have been brought on direct review.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.