Barrientes v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
221 F.3d 741 · 2000
Citation profile
63 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 147 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2021 · most notably Dennis Thurl Dowthitt v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (2000), Cargle v. Mullin (2003)
63 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Slack v. McDaniel · Chapman v. State of California · Williams v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 147 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[a] new trial is required if `the false testimony could . . . in any reasonable likelihood have affected the judgment of the jury. . . .'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.