Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 221 Kan. 10 - State v. Warren

State v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2021

18 state decisions

80197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wilkins · State v. Boyd · State v. Ritson · State v. Beard · State v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The intent to deprive permanently must be inferred from the overt facts and circumstances proven. Unless the facts establish an intent to ransom the property back to the owner or to sell or encumber it, the jury must decide in the individual case whether the circumstances intended by the defendant entailed the likelihood that the property would not be restored. The crucial factual inquiry will be directed to the use the defendant intended when he obtained or exercised unauthorized control.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(a) Take from the owner the possession, use or benefit of his or her property, without an intent to restore the same; or “(b) Retain property without intent to restore the same or with intent to restore it to the owner only if the owner purchases or leases it back, or pays a reward or other compensation for its return.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.