Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 221 Kan. 203 - State v. Colbert

State v. Colbert’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
6
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently February 2007 · most notably 6 Kan. App. 2d 688 - State v. Puckett (1981), State v. White & Stewart (1978)

48 state decisions

2201976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strong v. United States · M. Morrin & Son Co. v. Burgess Construction Co. · State v. Wilkins · State v. Gustin · State v. McCorgary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A trial judge in passing upon a motion for judgment of acquittal must determine whether upon the evidence, giving full play to the right of the jury to determine credibility, weigh the evidence, and draw justifiable inferences of fact, a reasonable mind might fairly conclude guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If the judge concludes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is a fairly possible result, he must deny the motion and let the jury decide the matter. If he concludes that upon the evidence there must be such a doubt in a reasonable mind, he must grant the motion.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"Theft of lost or mislaid property is failure to take reasonable measures to restore lost or mislaid property to the lawful owner by a person who has obtained control of such property, who knows or learns the identity of the owner thereof, and who intends to deprive the owner permanently of the possession, use or benefit of the property."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.