Dunlap v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"A sentencing court may not consider a second or successive motion for relief by the same movant when: "(1) the ground for relief was determined adversely to the movant on a prior motion; "(2) the prior determination was on the merits; and "(3) justice would not be served by reaching the merits of the subsequent motion." Supreme Court Rule 183(d) (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 225).”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 18 Kan. App. 2d 435 - Carmichael v. State · Nguyen v. State

2. “[t]he sentencing court should not entertain a second or successive motion for relief under K.S.A. 60-1507 on behalf of the same person unless the errors affect constitutional rights and there are exceptional circumstances which justify entertaining a second or successive motion.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Littlejohn v. State · Nguyen v. State

3. “. . Mere trial erors are to be corrected by direct appeal, but trial errors affecting constitutional rights may be raised even though the error could have been raised on appeal, provided there were exceptional circumstances excusing the failure to appeal.” (183 [c] [3].)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. White v. State