State v. Gross’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

23 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Moreover, it appears doubtful whether an intoxication instruction was warranted under the evidence. While Miller, Lloyd and defendant all testified that considerable beer had been consumed, the defendant, nevertheless, testified: ‘. . . I knew what I was doing that evening and if I had stolen somethinfg] I would remember it. I am sure that I didn’t steal anything. I’m sure that I did not break into a car.’ “Everett Miller also testified: ‘Jerome did not have nearly as much to drink as did Danny Lloyd. Jerome was not at all that intoxicated.’ “We find no merit in defendant’s contention concerning the trial court’s refusal to submit an intoxication instruction.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 18 Kan. App. 2d 502 - State v. Montano

2. ““A mere allegation of a conflict of interest of counsel is not sufficient to show a denial of an accused’s constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel.” State v. Gross, 221 Kan. 98 , Syl. ¶ 2, 558 P.2d 665 (1976).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Rice