Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 221 Md. 445 - Abare v. Abare

Abare v. Abare’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 1998 · most notably Breault v. Breault (1968), 19 Md. App. 66 - Gosman v. Gosman (1973)

5 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

1901960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dougherty v. Dougherty · Swoyer v. Swoyer · Courson v. Courson · Lickle v. Lickle · Fisher v. Fisher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To prove adultery, the circumstantial evidence must clearly establish (1) a disposition on the part of the defendant and the paramour to commit adultery, and (2) an opportunity to commit the offense. After considering these and all other facts and circumstances in the case, the court then determines whether the evidence would convince an unprejudiced and cautious person of the guilt of the defendant.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““* * * The evidence was that on the first of these occasions Mr. Abare picked up Mary Ann at her apartment in Washington during the afternoon, that they were seen to enter Mr. Abare’s house at about 6:10 P.M., that at 9:30 the lights went out, that at 10:30 a light came on for a short time in the bathroom and that up to midnight the co-respondent had not left the house. The evidence as to her visit on March 28 was, in general, similar, except that the watch was continued until 4 A.M. on March 29th, without the co-respondent having been seen to leave the house.” Id. at 449 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““These facts seem to us sufficient to support an inference of a disposition on the part of both the husband and the corespondent to commit the offense charged, as well as to show ample opportunity to commit it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.