Murray v. Kator’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1957
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on French v. . Carhart · Case v. Owen · In re Blodgett's Estate · Smith v. Smith · Schulz v. Brohl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““All grants and devises of land, made to two or more persons, * * * shall be construed to create estates in common, and not in joint tenancy, unless expressly declared to be in joint tenancy.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Caswell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.