Stern v. Cinoman’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mullis v. Sechrest · Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hitchcock Corp. · 99 N.C. App. 317 - Snow v. Yates · 26 N.C. App. 494 - Swift and Company v. Dan-Cleve Corp. · 184 N.C. App. 526 - Clawser v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A determination of venue under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-83 (1) is ... a question of law that [this Court] review[s] de novo .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the county designated for that purpose in the summons and complaint is not the proper one, the action may, however, be tried therein, unless the defendant, before the time of answering expires, demands in writing that the trial be conducted in the proper county, and the place of trial is thereupon changed by consent of parties, or by order of the court. The court may change the place of trial in the following cases: (1) When the county designated for that purpose is not the proper one.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the county designated ... is not the proper one”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.