State v. Schulz’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Morgan · State v. Stratton · State v. Lingle · State v. Suhr · 132 Cal. App. 2d 484 - People v. Fuentes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If such person (i) has had one conviction under this section in the ten years prior to the date of the current conviction . . . such person shall be guilty of a Class W misdemeanor, and the court shall, as part of the judgment of conviction, order such person not to drive any motor vehicle for any purpose for a period of one year from the date ordered by the court and shall order that the operator’s license of such person be revoked for a like period____ For each conviction under this section, the court shall as part of the judgment of conviction make a finding on the record as to the number of the defendant’s prior convictions under this section____”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kramer“`for a period of one year from the date of his or her conviction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nelson“to be addressed by the Legislature rather than by this court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nelson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.