Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 221 Neb. 629 - State v. Holmes

State v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2024

24 state decisions

10019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1501 (Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002)

Relies on United States v. Ward · United States v. $2,500 In United States Currency · United States v. Keith · 122 Ill. App. 3d 733 - People v. Evans · 69 Ill. 2d 402 - Hoffmann v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If any person is convicted for violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, in addition to any penalty imposed by the court, the court may order that such person make restitution to any law enforcement agency for reasonable expenditures made in the purchase of any controlled substances from such person or his or her agent as part of the investigation leading to such conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Such a heading, caption, or catchline is supplied in the compilation of the statutes and does not constitute any part of the law. State v. Holmes, 221 Neb. 629 , 379 N.W.2d 765 (1986); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 49-802(8) (Reissue 1984). See, also, Cosentino v. City of Omaha, 186 Neb. 407 , 183 N.W.2d 475 (1971). Neb.Rev.Stat. § 38-101 (Reissue 1984) states all persons”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.